As outlined contribution (DC) plans proceed to evolve, plan sponsors face growing complexity in managing retirement advantages. With $12.5 trillion in property (3Q 2024) and accounting for one-third of all US retirement property, DC plans carry vital accountability for guaranteeing robust monetary outcomes for members1. In 2025, plan sponsors should concentrate on optimizing funding methods, lowering prices, and enhancing participant training to enhance retirement readiness.
The highest priorities for DC plans in 2025 embody essential areas reminiscent of goal date fund choice, charge transparency, funding lineup analysis, and staying forward of regulatory and litigation tendencies.
Concentrating on Goal Date Funds (TDFs)
The Division of Labor’s steerage, Goal Date Retirement Funds — Ideas for ERISA Plan Fiduciaries, outlines finest practices for TDF choice2. Key takeaways embody:
- Establishing a course of for choosing and evaluating TDFs and for periodic evaluation
- Understanding the TDFs’ underlying investments and the glidepath
- Reviewing the TDFs’ charges and funding bills
- Profiting from all obtainable data within the evaluation and decision-making course of
- Documenting the method
- Creating efficient worker communications.
Implicit on this steerage are three key points to consider. First, as with every funding course of, it is very important perceive the aim of the investments is to assist your distinctive group of staff make investments for retirement. Second, analyze the traits of the workforce by gathering workforce demographics, funding behavioral tendencies — generally present in studies produced by the recordkeeper — and different workforce information. Lastly, set up the plan sponsor’s objectives for the plan and total funding beliefs that may function a information when evaluating numerous TDFs. Making prudent funding selections requires these parts to drive the evaluation and determine TDFs which might be appropriate in your workforce.
Understanding Funding Charges and Share Courses
We frequently see conditions the place the plan sponsor goes via the hassle of discovering an ideal funding technique after which selects a less-than-optimal funding automobile.
For instance, a plan sponsor or its advisor would possibly choose a mutual fund share class for which the expense ratio consists of revenue-share {dollars}, that are paid to the advisor or collected by the recordkeeper to credit score in opposition to its charges, fairly than utilizing a zero-revenue share class. In different instances, a plan is perhaps eligible (meet the minimal funding threshold) for a collective funding belief (CIT) automobile with a decrease expense ratio than the mutual fund model(s) of the funding technique. Typically, these selections or oversights end in plan members paying larger funding charges and recordkeeper charges than if the plan sponsor had optimized the selection of funding automobile.
We advise plan sponsors consider the impact on participants of their present mutual fund share courses, if not zero income, and whether or not the plan qualifies for similar CIT technique. We advocate plan sponsors use zero-revenue share courses of mutual funds or collective funding trusts, as relevant, as they supply better charge transparency and sometimes decrease total charges, all else equal, than plans using revenue-sharing share courses.
Evaluating Funding Lineup Construction
Most committees’ routine funding evaluations observe an identical format: a take a look at the financial system and capital markets adopted by a evaluation of the efficiency and danger metrics of the funding menu. If there are funds on watch or in want of alternative, adjustments are mentioned. Whereas routine evaluations of plan fiduciaries are anticipated, we advise supplementing with a periodic evaluation of the funding lineup construction, that means funding classes (Determine 1) and whether or not they’re applied with energetic administration or passive administration. We advise such a evaluation at the very least each three years or earlier if workforce demographics change in a significant manner.
Determine 1: Basic Funding Construction.
In Determine 1, we present a generic funding lineup construction. To guage the appropriateness of the lineup construction, plan sponsors should start by plotting the present funding menu utilizing the columns proven. This visualization can facilitate dialogue about whether or not the present construction is suitable or whether or not funding classes needs to be altered. Components for the dialogue may embody participant group funding information, age, demographics, and extent of retiree inhabitants within the plan.
Providing Complete Monetary Schooling Assets
In our 2024 Financial Wellness in the Workplace Study, staff reported spending at the very least three hours per week worrying about private funds, with 68% stating that monetary stress negatively impacts their psychological well being. And three out of 4 employers acknowledged that employees’ monetary stress negatively impacts office operations3.
Now we have seen firsthand how monetary wellness advantages can assist staff enhance their monetary well being and cut back these challenges. Whereas conventional group conferences have traditionally performed a big function — significantly for workforces the place a big share of the inhabitants shouldn’t be at a desk – there’s a significant enhance within the variety of plan sponsors and their staff on the lookout for individualized one-on-one conferences with monetary educators. These personal conferences allow staff to have candid conversations about their distinctive monetary challenges.
Analyzing Committee Construction and Obligations
Employment tendencies from “the nice resignation” to “the large keep” and “the nice reshuffling” illustrate the mobility of at the moment’s workforce. These adjustments additionally negatively affect an organization’s retirement plan committee. Causes would possibly differ from altering positions to leaving the corporate or retirement.
Committees ought to get again to the fundamentals in 2025 by doing the next:
- Doc the committee construction and duties
- Construct an onboarding training guidelines for brand new committee members
- Keep a calendar construction for fiduciary persevering with training
- Verify the fiduciary file is updated, together with the funding coverage assertion, government summaries, and funding reporting
Monitoring Developments in Litigation and Regulation
With vital provisions of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Job Acts expiring on the finish of 2025, there’s the potential for brand new tax laws. Modifications to tax-advantaged retirement packages can include tax laws, so it will likely be necessary for plan sponsors to remain present on potential adjustments.
From a litigation standpoint, two main tendencies formed 2024: plan charges and utilization of forfeiture property.
Plan charges stay a perennial focus. Has the committee fulfilled its fiduciary responsibility to observe plan bills in order that they’re cheap for the companies offered? You will need to be aware that this matter covers each vendor bills, reminiscent of recordkeeping and advisor bills, and funding administration bills, reminiscent of selection of funding supervisor or the share class utilized.
The present wave of litigation relating to utilization of forfeiture property is a brand new phenomenon. The litigation has targeted on whether or not plan sponsors are permitted to make use of forfeiture property to scale back employer contributions, or if they’re restricted to paying permissible vendor bills or distributing the funds to participant accounts.
With the potential for change and continued uptick in litigation, plan sponsors ought to collaborate with their advisors to remain on prime of those and different tendencies in regulation and litigation in 2025.
Plan sponsors play a pivotal function in shaping the monetary way forward for thousands and thousands of staff. By prioritizing funding optimization, price effectivity, governance, and participant training, they will improve retirement outcomes and cut back fiduciary dangers. As market situations, workforce demographics, and regulatory landscapes evolve, steady evaluation and strategic decision-making can be key to making sure DC plans stay efficient, aggressive, and aligned with participant wants. By specializing in these six priorities, plan sponsors can drive significant affect in 2025 and past.
Disclosures
The fabric introduced herein is of a basic nature and doesn’t represent the supply by PNC of funding, authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation to any particular person, or a suggestion to purchase or promote any safety or undertake any funding technique. The knowledge contained herein was obtained from sources deemed reliable. Such data shouldn’t be assured as to its accuracy, timeliness, or completeness by PNC. The knowledge contained and the opinions expressed herein are topic to vary with out discover.
The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. (“PNC”) makes use of the advertising and marketing title PNC Institutional Asset Administration® for the assorted discretionary and non-discretionary institutional funding, trustee, custody, consulting, and associated companies offered by PNC Financial institution, Nationwide Affiliation (“PNC Financial institution”), which is a Member FDIC, and funding administration actions performed by PNC Capital Advisors, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial institution. PNC doesn’t present authorized, tax, or accounting recommendation except, with respect to tax recommendation, PNC Financial institution has entered right into a written tax companies settlement. PNC Financial institution shouldn’t be registered as a municipal advisor underneath the Dodd-Frank Wall Avenue Reform and Shopper Safety Act.
“PNC Institutional Asset Administration” is a registered mark of The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. Investments: Not FDIC Insured. No Financial institution Assure. Might Lose Worth. ©2025 The PNC Monetary Providers Group, Inc. All rights reserved.
